This Is Me--2024 A to Z Theme

My A to Z Themes in the past have covered a range of topics and for 2025 the theme is a random assemblage of things that are on my mind--or that just pop into my mind. Whatever! Let's just say I'll be "Tossing It Out" for your entertainment or however it is you perceive these things.

Monday, July 16, 2012

What the Heck Is Professional Writing? : Guest Hijacker Callie Leuck

           I could be anywhere between Las Cruces, New Mexico and Houston, Texas as you read this, so don't mind me--I'm driving.  Here today behind the wheel of my blog is Callie Leuck from Write On!

What in the heck is "professional writing" anyway?
A professional writer's struggles in explaining professional writing
By Callie Leuck, writer, dreamer, and Oxford comma enthusiast


"I just have one more question and it's kinda broad," Courtney Elsten, a professional writing student from my alma mater, asked me as she wrapped up the interview for the alumni profile she was reporting. "What does professional writing mean to you?"


That had to be a question from Michael Salvo. I got that quick, panicky feeling I'd had four years before in Introduction to Professional Writing at Purdue, when Dr. Salvo had leaned forward on the very first day of class and said, slowly, deliberately, "So. What is professional writing?"


Answering this question is a personal, basic, and necessary challenge. Unlike many other professions or fields, the question What is professional writing? is inherently a test of skill. When you ask a writer "What is [insert type of writing]?" the answer s/he gives is an example of her/his skill. It's like asking a rock climber to "scale that rock over there," a musician to "play something," a comedian to "say something funny."


Dance, monkey, dance.


It would be just like Dr. Salvo to send his current students off to ask alumni that same question. I imagined him leaning back in his chair, the corners of his mouth quirking up in that impish smile, and suggesting to students planning interview questions for alumni, "You might ask them what professional writing is."


Because even though we've matriculated, we're not beyond the echoes of the first time that he asked us that very question -- echoing out of the mouths of potential employers, interview subjects, friends and relatives, and every single person at every dinner party or happy hour we ever attend. And Dr. Salvo knows that.


It's a question I still think about a lot because I know that the answer is something to do with simplifying the complex; explaining the seemingly-unexplainable; and communicating with clarity, often concisely, and sometimes (if I'm very lucky) beautifully. And so my answer to that question must be all of those things because professional writing (and my personal love, science writing) is, at its core, highly effective communication. So if I can't somehow communicate clearly what I do, reduce all the complexities and strangeness that is professional writing to some kind of basic yet meaningful explanation, then how can I hope to ever do so for any other thing? How can I hope to write about some wonderful yet esoteric science if I cannot explain the purpose of my own dear profession?


I think that what I do a lot as a writer is speak for people who don't or can't speak for themselves. Or maybe they're just really bad at articulating their story. (Note: I am using "story" in a general way to describe any type of narrative writing, but mainly I am talking about nonfiction.) I think a lot about narrative and storylines, and I think the ability to tease those out of the beautiful mess that is life is maybe not a skill that everybody has. Maybe not everybody goes around thinking What is the story? Where is the story? Is this a story? Sometimes I think a story is one thing and it turns out to be another.


Here's what I like in a story: a compelling narrative with fascinating science woven throughout, and a nonscientific audience enjoying it.


I find it amazing how some of the same basic skills in writing are so applicable to seemingly-different products of writing. Communication. Clarity. Conciseness. Narrative. Those things alone basically describe every type of writing I have done, although I personally prefer my work to also be entertaining and beautiful whenever possible. But you can't always have it all.


So what did I tell Courtney when she asked me to define professional writing?


I was not articulate. I was not concise. I was not prepared. I should have been, but I wasn't. For all the many times I've struggled to answer that question, you'd think I'd have something ready. Luckily, Courtney was able to pull a quote out of my ramblings:

"I think Professional Writing is high-quality communication, and just being really thoughtful and deliberate about it."
Thank you for making me not look like an idiot, Courtney. And thank you for repeatedly calling me "successful" in your report.



I'm constantly refining my explanation of what professional writing is, and specifically what science writing is. I'm getting closer to something true. Maybe ask me next year. I'll get it someday, Dr. Salvo. Probably.




Many thanks to Lee for letting me hijack his blog today. I am a proposal writer by day, a science-medical graduate student by night, and a writer-of-fiction in the nooks and crannies. I have different outfits for each of these roles, so I'm basically like a superhero but without a cape. However I do have a growing scarf collection. I'll be responding to comments here on this post on Lee's blog because I lovelovelove interacting with anyone who read all the way through my ramblings and has something to say. Thanks again for the opportunity, Lee! --Callie.




www.callieleuck.com


Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, July 13, 2012

A Hijacker Gets Hijacked! Michael Pierce Guest Post

My Photo                  Today I welcome guest hijacker Michael Pierce from Michael Pierce Blog.  He has a book series that you may want to check out.  He'll tell you more about that later.  But for now it looks like Michael's hijacking post has been in turn hijacked by one of his characters--a strange twist of events.



      Thank you, Arlee, for the opportunity to hijack your blog. Happy Friday the 13th, everyone. I had planned to tell a scary story in honor of this superstitious day, but felt compelled to turn my post over to Cdre. Chaos. He has an important message, so I’ll let him take it away…

Citizens of Greater Meric, a storm is coming. The Lorne family is not made up of benevolent saviors as they’ve spellbound so many into thinking. For everything they’ve given our society, they’ve taken far more for themselves. They walk amongst us like gods. Above the government. Above the law. Above reproach. What they do is not for the greater good and thus do not deserve our thanks and humble obedience.

The Lornes have plagued us like vampires for too long. In some regions they’re regarded as royalty and in others, ingenious entrepreneurs. Look back at their ancestors and notice the remarkable similarities. Coincidence, or have they long lived past their natural welcome.

There is a new threat out there, especially to those reading what I’ve written over the past few years. I don’t tell you this to insight fear, but to urge you to beware the wolf-head tattoo. There are citizens disappearing. I know what you’re thinking, but we all know better than to wander into the symmetric plane. We’ve been told this since childhood. Instead, it’s a sinister plot orchestrated by the Lorne family themselves for anyone raising a voice against them. For us, they’ve built a cozy new home called SUSY Asylum.

If you’re finding this post, then I thank you as always. I know I’m often hard to find on the interlanet. But I continue fighting to get my message to you, no matter how much I’m threatened. I assure you, I’m in a safe place for now, but I must keep moving. But if my absence is uncharacteristically prolonged, then you’ll know where to find me. SUSY Asylum.

We can’t allow this to continue! Please stand with me against the storm.


        The second book in The Lorne Family Vault Series has finally turned from a WIP to a finished draft! And as promised, I am announcing the title right here and now: SUSY Asylum.

        The first book in the series, Provex City, is currently available on Amazon as a Kindle ebook and in paperback.  Visit me on my blog to chat and find out more about the series.


      Thank you, Arlee, and to everyone reading. Have a spooky and spectacular weekend!






            Anyone out there read Provex City yet?  Want to tell us about it?  



Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Is It Better To Be "Nice" Or Honest? : Guest Hijacker Andrew Leon

My Photo          In this guest Hijack This Blog! spot we have a guy who's not afraid to lay things out straight and tell it like it is.  Andrew Leon blogs at Strange Pegs and any of you who know Andrew's blog, know that he does not mince words.  I made a special request for him to address a difficult topic that I've considered writing about, but I think Andrew can do it better.  He's also touched upon this topic on his own blog here and here.   It's something that I think is worth talking about.  Read and let us know what you think.


Is It Better To Be “Nice” Or Honest?

Reviews are necessary for authors. Completely necessary. As such, I feel the best way to support other independent authors is to buy, read, and review their books (or, at least, read and review if I have the option to get the book free). It's great and all to do blog tours and post when your buds release books, but, honestly, it doesn't sway me to buy the book if you haven't read it. I mean, if you haven't taken the time to read your friend's book, why should I? Give me a review, though, and I'll start to think about it.

The question, then, is how to go about reviewing a fellow author's book. Do you do the nice thing and just say the book is good (or avoid the review all together (but, remember, without the review, I won't think about buying it)) or do you be honest without regard to the good or the bad?

Giving the “nice” review (or avoiding bad reviews) is the easy thing to do. It's probably also better in the short term, and it doesn't have the risk of ruining online relationships. Heck, you might even get someone to buy a copy of a book that way (I know I have). Great short term gain, right? But is it the best thing to do?

I don't think so.

Giving an honest, objective review is a hard thing to do, especially if you know the person. You know how people respond to bad reviews (assuming the review is bad); is it worth the risk?

What's The Risk?

There are two main factors to look at here: 1. your own credibility 2. the bigger picture of the independent publishing world.

Let's talk about your own credibility. There are several (many) bloggers whose reviews I completely dismiss at this point. Why? Because they only give good reviews. It's impossible to tell if the review is “real” or not. Is this person saying the book is good because it is good or because s/he was trying to not hurt the author's feelings? I've been fooled by more than a few of these “nice” reviews, so, when I see that an author only gives positive reviews, I can't take his/her recommendations seriously. It's okay to talk about the books you love if you only talk about the books you love, but that's not the same as a review, and I'm still going to ignore any promotion you may do of another author's book unless every book you promote is obviously a book you've read and really loved.

If you only give positive reviews, you may have the short term gain of an author's gratitude, but you lose credibility as a reviewer and as someone who knows anything about writing if you continually plug books just to be nice. Yes, it affects peoples' opinion of your own writing ability if you push bad books just to be nice to your blogger friend. If you can't tell such-and-such a book is bad, that means you also can't tell if your own writing is bad. If you can't tell if your own writing is bad, I'm not going to risk reading a book that you write.

What it really comes down to if you're going to be nice is that you have to refuse promoting books you haven't read or didn't like. You have to develop a reputation of only talking about the books you really love if you want people to believe your posts about other people's books. If I buy the book on your recommendation and don't like it, at that point, at least I know that that is just an issue of taste, not being fooled into buying a bad book. Of course, the truth is, this really is a form of reviewing with the veneer of niceness. What you leave off of your list becomes just as important as the things on it, and, then, you have to have the ability to tell other authors that you can't promote their books, which risks bad feelings, and that's what you were trying to avoid to begin with right?

Think of the Long Term Repercussions

All of this affects the overall independent marketplace, too. One of the reasons people buy books from the traditional, big publishers is that they trust them. They trust that those guys have made some kind of judgment as to the quality of the book. By some standard, it's worth reading. People don't trust the independent market, and they don't trust it because we don't give them anything to trust.

Right now, anyone can publish any piece of trash they decide to throw out there, and there are plenty of people doing just that. And, right now, the independent book publishers (meaning, mostly, the authors themselves) are yelling, “Buy our books! They're great! It's not our fault that traditional publishers couldn't see it.” The problem is that that is just not true. The vast majority of independently published books are garbage. Not that they have to be, but they are missing so many steps in the process, especially editing, that any story that's worth reading is too hard to find. What the reader finds is garbage, and the reader finds garbage because a bunch of the author's author friends gave the book a good review to be “nice.” What the reader takes away from it is “The big publishers are right; this independent stuff is garbage. I'm not buying any more of it.”

That is something that we, as independently published authors, can't live with. We have to change the perception of the larger reading world, and the only way we can do that is by being honest. The only way we can do that is by not promoting books we haven't read. By not giving “nice” reviews to books that don't deserve it. By approaching each work as objectively as we can and having the courage to say to someone, “You need to go back to work on this.”

So what do you think?   Andrew has more to say about this on his own blog today.  Be sure to click on over to Strange Pegs to get more on this topic.  



Enhanced by Zemanta