This Is Me--2024 A to Z Theme

My A to Z Themes in the past have covered a range of topics and for 2025 the theme is a random assemblage of things that are on my mind--or that just pop into my mind. Whatever! Let's just say I'll be "Tossing It Out" for your entertainment or however it is you perceive these things.
Showing posts with label Preferences. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Preferences. Show all posts

Monday, September 5, 2016

What Is Your Favorite Kind of Music? (Question of the Month)

       Why do you like what you like?   This is not always an easy question to answer and sometimes there is never one answer that will be consistent throughout ones life.  In my case I've gone through many stages of preferences.  What we like can change throughout our lives.  The quest in this post is to consider questions like "why do our preferences change?"

         For this month's Question topic I'll be discussing musical preference.  However, before you go on, if you haven't voted on my most recent Battle of the Bands post then I hope you will go back to do so.   The song that I've used is one that I like a great deal performed in two styles that I also enjoy.   Listening to this song doesn't answer the question of this month as it applies to me, but it offers a clue.   Well, maybe it does, but then again maybe it doesn't.

        After all, the question of preference can be a complex one that is not easily answered in a few words or paragraphs.   I'll try to keep my answer somewhat brief.

          Did you vote on my Battle?   It's here if you didn't visit yet.

           Now let's move on to the business at hand...


Question of the Month


The Question of the Month is hosted by Michael G D'Agostino from A Life Examined. The first Monday of each month I'll be answering a question posed by Michael prior to event day. Click on the link to his blog for more participants. 




This month's question

      Suggested by Alex J. Cavanaugh, here is the question for this month:

“What kind of music best speaks to you?”

         The subject of preference is one that I've explored many times with no absolute conclusion ever drawn.  Even when it comes down to the specific topic of music I can't name just one specific kind of music.  My ears perk at just about any kind of music since I'm a musically inquisitive person by nature.  Music was a integral part of my upbringing and has played a huge role in my life.  

          Some of my earliest memories involve music and music has been a soundtrack of my life.  Place, time, and circumstance play a role in whatever music I might be listening to.  The company I am keeping or what I need to feel within me can determine what music I am listening to at any given time.  Even an arbitrary intrusion of music will cause me to pause and listen--and ultimately decide if I like what I'm hearing or not.  Rarely do I associate music with any bad memory.  

          Taking for example, as referenced in my current Battle of the Bands post, I have an affinity for Latin flavored music--especially the music of Mexico.  When I was a child my parents often played Latin style music around the house.  I can recall often listening to an album of bullfight music.  My mother used to do housework listening to Perez Prado.   My father was on a continual quest to find catchy fast-paced juggling music which typically would contain lots of Latin style percussion.  Part of my musical fabric was dyed with music from South of the Border and now hearing any of that style of music catches my musical attention as well as takes me to some comfortable emotion within me.  

          Similarly classical and pop music is something I was weaned on from an early age to the extent that listening to either style is now a steady part of my musical diet.  Years of listening to rock music has instilled within me a deep appreciation for all forms of that style and other related styles of music.  Now I long for music in the same way that I feel a need for food, air, and a comfortable place to sleep.  Sometimes the music sets my mood while at other times I decide the playlist. The music is almost always there.  And when the music is not there in the physical realm then it is often playing in my mind.            

            So what specific type of music speaks to me best?  This is a case where superlatives are variables.   The music that speaks best to me depends on me at the moment.  There are times when I don't want to hear any music at all--a rarity, but it has happened.  But then one might argue that this is when the music seeps through the silence--the wind, nature, street sounds, industrial clanking, or even the beat of my own heart and the blood coursing my veins.  

            The music that speaks best to me is whichever music happens to be speaking at the moment.

             What types of music are you most drawn to?    What is the most specific part of music that appeals to you?   Did you ever or do you now play an instrument?  

Thursday, September 1, 2016

El Listón De Tu Pelo (#BOTB)

     Why do we like the music that we like?  What makes us avoid listening to certain types of music? I've explored these questions in previous posts, but still the topic continues to be worth consideration.   Next Monday (September 5th) I'll be contemplating these thoughts with my next Question of the Month post.   But first comes a Battle of the Bands post that is the beginning of the views that I'll be expressing in that Monday post.

        In this round I'm using a song that will be likely unfamiliar to most of you and this is probably because you don't listen to this type of music.  Though there have been some big chart hits in the United States,  Canada, and United Kingdom that were in a language other than English, it's certainly not the norm.  Many music fans like to understand what the lyrics are saying so they are often turned off by music in a language they don't understand.  Then there are those like me who typically don't pay much attention to lyrics--at least not on first hearings--and instead take in the feel of the music.  For me lyrics are secondary to the sound of the music.

       There are many songs that I can sing through the first line or two and then I'm lost.  Perhaps it seems odd for a person who enjoys writing not to care about the lyrics.  In my case that's just the way it is.  If a song consisted of nonsense syllables then I might not like that so much.  I want a song to be saying something, but I don't always care much about what it is saying.  There are songs that I have listened to and enjoyed for many years and I still don't know what the lyrical content is about.  And that's fine with me as long as the song sounds good to my ears.



Battle of the Bands is the blogging event started by Far Away Series and now hosted by StMcC Presents Battle of the Bands.   This event happens twice each month on the 1st and 15th.   The premise is simple:  Listen to the songs presented below and then in the comments vote for your favorite and tell us why you liked it.  Then visit the links listed near the bottom of this post for more Battle action.



"El Listón de Tu Pelo"

          In the year 2000 when I was frequently listening to one of the popular Los Angeles Spanish language music stations, a song that began to receive frequent airplay caught my attention.  "El Listón de Tu Pelo" ("The Ribbon in Your Hair") initially struck me as somewhat comical sounding with its banda cumbia fusion. Punctuated by flourishes of a mariachi-like brass section with an infectious percussive background that makes one want to move in rhythm to the music if not actually get up and dance, the song caught on with me.  There was something about the plaintive vocal trade-offs between the male and female singers.   I didn't have much idea of what the song was about, but the sound of the music was appealing to me.  I found the song to be a catchy tune that inspired me to purchase the album.

          Fast forward to the present time when I happened to run across this song again on YouTube.  Los Angeles Azules--or The Blue Angels in English--had been collaborating with other well known artists as well as symphony orchestras in covering their own hits.  I was blown away by these performances.  The song that had captivated me some 16 years earlier was again on my regular playlist.   And not only were there the new covers of  "El Listón de Tu Pelo" that I found but another cool version by a popular Latina female rocker.  To me this seemed like an ideal pairing for another Battle of the Bands contest. 

         For reference only here is the original version of the song.  DO NOT VOTE FOR THIS VERSION!   If the video is restricted in your country you can try this link.




Vote for one of the following:

Julieta Venegas - "El Listón De Tu Pelo"  (2005)


        Besides being a very attractive singer, Julieta Venegas is an incredibly talented songwriter, producer, and instrumentalist.   Venegas was born in Long Beach, California, but grew up in Tijuana, Mexico where she started her musical career at a young age eventually joining various rock groups including the influential Tijuana No!.  In 1997 Venegas embarked upon her very successful solo career.  She has won several Grammy awards and written music for theater and movies.  Her many musical collaborations include her cover of "El Listón de Tu Pelo" with Jarabe de Palo, a rock group from Spain.

        Try to listen to this with an open mind as the initial rap/hip-hop sounds might be a turn off to some--it was for me.  The recording does get better with the Latin percussion and some funky singing that retains the cumbia flavor of the original while keeping the sound fresh and updated.  But you decide with your own ears.





Denise Gutiérrez  "El Listón De Tu Pelo" (2014)
        This version is actually by the original group Los Angeles Azules who are joined by a small symphony orchestra, a choir, and singer Denise Gutiérrez who is the vocalist with the Mexican alternative pop band Hello Seahorse!. Denise was born in Van Nuys, California, but raised in Mexico City.   This video is one of many collaborations with orchestra and well known Mexican artists.  These videos are pretty incredible and I've been watching (or listening to) these repeatedly over the past few months.  
 (If you cannot access video below, try clicking on title above.)





Time to Vote!

         Hope you've enjoyed this music that might be new to you and perhaps a bit alien sounding.  Maybe it's not your style of music, but hopefully you'll keep a musically open mind in assessing the two versions.   Let us know what you think about these two recordings. Is there one that you prefer over the other?    If you're visiting a Battle of the Bands post for the first time then let me briefly explain.  Please give each song version a fair listen to decide which one you enjoy the most.  If you don't like either then at least tell us which recording was least innocuous to you. This comes down to your preference and it's as easy as that.

     Please vote on your favorite by letting us know your choice in the comment section and tell us why you prefer the version you chose. Then after you've finished here, please visit the other blogs listed below who may or may not be participating this time around. And if you've put up your own BOTB contest let us know that as well so we can vote on yours.

Here are some other places where you might find BOTB posts:


 StMcC Presents Battle of the Bands

 ‘YOUR DAILY DOSE’ 

  'MIKE'S RAMBLINGS'

'Curious as a Cathy'

Sound of One Hand Typing

DC Relief Battle of the Bands

The Doglady's Den 

Angel's Bark  

Cherdo on the Flipside  

Jingle, Jangle, Jungle 

Janie Junebug Righting & Editing.
  
J. A. Scott  

Quiet Laughter

Holli's Hoots and Hollers

Be ReInVintaged

the pedestrian writer

Winner Announced on Wednesday September 7th

         Since I'll be posting on Wednesday the 7th for the Insecure Writer's Support Group, rather than do too many posts next week I'll merge my BOTB results into the IWSG post.  Add to that my Question of the Month post on Monday the 5th and I've got a busy schedule according to my posting habits as they have become.  Please join me for these posts.

         Do you pay much attention to song lyrics or do you typically just absorb the musical experience?   Is listening to music in a language you don't understand a turn-off to you?    What is your favorite pop/rock music collaboration with orchestra?  
        

Friday, June 5, 2015

This Ain't No Disco!


    "...this ain't no disco, this ain't no fooling around."   No, this is some serious stuff, my friends!

Disco ball in blue
Disco ball in blue (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

        Remember the saying "Disco Sucks"?   Back in the day you could find T-shirts with the slogan and there was even a special night at a White Sox baseball game when a special anti-disco promotion was held.  The "Disco Sucks" movement has been credited to Detroit rock DJ Steve Dahl who would "blow up" disco records on the air to the delight of his hardcore rock and roll fan base.   

         Some have made the claim that the Disco Sucks movement had undertones of hate toward certain groups of society.  Maybe that was true for some people.  For me I like music because I enjoy the listening experience or I dislike some music because it isn't pleasant for me to hear.  As with any creation I don't necessarily reject it because of who made it or what that creative person believes or believed.  If that were my criteria for accepting things or creations then I would be very limited in what I owned or liked.

        As I've been discussing in recent posts my preferences in music are dependent on what I like to hear in music--what I look for in a musical work.   So if I heard a song that was lyrically superb, expressing ideas with which I was in total agreement, and that song had one of the most beautiful melodies that I had ever heard and I had absolutely enjoyed this song for years and then suddenly one day I learned that the song had been composed by some horrible person--say like Adolph Hitler--would the sound of the song be any different?   

       Sure, it's possible that now with my new knowledge I might start to convince myself to dislike the song or just stop listening to it, but if the work had some endearing quality once, then how is that quality lost by learning something bad about the person who wrote it?   

         Again I'm rambling a bit, but there is a point in there somewhere and maybe you'll want to share your thoughts in the comments.  Actually I started this line of thought because I just wanted to use that line "This ain't no disco" from the Talking Heads song "Life During Wartime".   And I'm not using the line because that's going to be my next Battle of the Bands song choice, but because in my recent song choice "This is a party!".  

         That's what Battle of the Bands should be like--a fun party.  Yes, we might get a bit snide to hopefully only a slight degree and we might poke some good-natured fun at one another or the song choices that are picked.  We all don't have to like the same things and that should be expected.   Let's just have a good time!

So now on with the winning version of "Garden Party"





          I was not overly surprised by the results though I didn't expect Owl City to do quite as well as they did in this match up.   Yes, I expected Johnny Lee to win this, not by a shut-out, but with a resounding victory.  I was right cause that's what happened.  My vote for Johnny Lee doesn't even matter all that much.

Final Tally:

Owl City                15   Votes

Johnny Lee             27  Votes

Coming Soon!
     A new Battle of the Bands will be here on Monday June 15th.   I don't think we'll have the kind of trouncing we had in this most recent Battle.   In fact, due to the nature of the song I don't know whether I'll get anywhere near the votes I got on this contest.   I hope the next song doesn't scare away too many of you because it's a darn good one with versions by two excellent artists.  If you don't like my next song pick then you must be a commie or something.   For that matter you might even like it if you are a commie.   My next song pick has been around for nearly 80 years with the more recent versions that I'll be featuring by a new wave prog rock band that turned it into a mega hit and a singer who was in his nineties when he made his own hit recording of this song that he had recorded decades prior.  Those are the versions you'll be voting on.

            Do you enjoy disco music?   Did you ever "blow up" or destroy disco records?   Any idea what song or artists I'll be coming up with next?

Friday, May 29, 2015

Is Music Your Friend?

Eye in the Sky (album)
Eye in the Sky (album) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)


Well the music is your special friend
Dance on fire as it intends
Music is your only friend
Until the end

--The Doors

        In late June of 1982 I was sitting in the parking lot of a supermarket in Billings, Montana listening to the radio when I heard the Alan Parsons Project song "Eye in the Sky".   Even before the song had ended I decided that this was a perfect pop hit and one of my favorite songs.  To this day I stand by this.   This is a song that I never tire of hearing.

       Sometime in 1985 the song "Cherish" by Kool and the Gang was released.   I had heard songs by Kool and the Gang for over a decade and never cared for the group that much though I didn't find their songs totally obnoxious--it just wasn't my kind of music.  "Cherish" received extensive airplay after its release.  I heard it often, but for the most part ignored it as it just wasn't my kind of music.

       Then one afternoon sometime in January of 1988 I was sitting in the parking lot of Buddy's Market in Maryville, Tennessee listening to the radio when the song "Cherish" came on.  As I listened closely I realized what a beautiful song it was.  The lyrics touched me deeply at that moment.  Not only did this song become another one of my favorites, but I started buying Kool and the Gang albums as I began enjoying their other music.  Now "Cherish" is another one of my favorite songs--I still well up with emotion whenever I listen to this exquisite song.

      After I'd bought the album that contained the song "Cherish" I was playing it one day as my show crew was setting up our equipment for our performance later that night.  As the song "Cherish" was playing I happened to mention to one of the young female cast members with whom I used to discuss music a lot how I thought the song was so beautiful.   My comment was met with laughter as she responded, "Really!  That's the cheesiest song ever. I can't stand it!"

      Well, go figure.  Granted her favorite music was Morrissey and The Smiths--music that I likewise enjoyed--but I was baffled by her reaction to the song "Cherish".  I wondered how someone could not like that song.  But then I remembered that I was in no way impressed with the song either for a few years of having heard it.  What was different about my experience and why should she have liked the song?

        In some respects I think the way we appreciate music is similar to the way we make friends.  Maybe your experiences are similar to mine.  There have been people whom I have met and we immediately clicked.  I liked them as soon as I saw them and remained friends with them throughout the years.  Then there are certain people whom I had to learn to appreciate.

       One of my best friends is an example. When I first met him I didn't care for him much at all and soon I came to somewhat dislike him.  As time passed, I discovered this man to be an amazingly talented fellow as well as a very intelligent conversationalist.  Over a period of several years I began to realize how this guy was someone I could always count on to do what he said he was going to do and was an extremely reliable individual.  Now he is one of my favorite people and one of the few of my friends in Tennessee whom I call on a regular basis.   It took some time, but I grew to like him.

        Maybe not everyone is like this, but I think we are all more alike than not.   For me at least, music is like the people I encounter.  I tend to be polite and civil toward just about everyone with whom I come into contact.  I'll give them a chance and maybe we become friends or maybe we don't. That's the way I approach music.   Maybe the music is immediately recognized as being compatible with my tastes or maybe I have to discover the nuances that allow me to appreciate the music in the same way my good friend took time for me to appreciate him.

         If there is music that I liked in the past, I will continue to find something to like now when I hear it.   I may not enjoy listening to that music as much now as I used to, but I can't say I hate it because that music holds memories and evokes feelings.   In fact, just as I prefer to say I don't hate any person, I don't like to say I hate any music as long as I can recognize some amount of talent that had to be present in order to create that music.

         The way I see it, music is people.  Not in the way Soylent Green is people, but in the sense that music is an extension of the person or the people who created it.  Writers should understand that as should anyone who creates.   That which we mindfully produce as an extension of our creative spirit is part of us.  The song composer might be someone who could possibly be a friend to us and so could the song the composer composes.    Music has value, but it may not have the same value to all of us.

          Your favorite song may not be my favorite because I have apparently not been in the zone you were when you decided that song was your favorite.  Timing, place, circumstance, experience all contribute to influencing our preference.   What we felt or who we were with when we heard a song can have a bearing on our liking it and it's possible that song might be in a genre we normally haven't liked before.  Who can explain it?   I'm sure there are explanations for each case, but they would be as many as the songs we have heard in our lifetime.

          So what's the point of all this?  Partly it's my contemplation on the nature of our preferences, our likes and dislikes, something to do with why we are like we are.  I'm just skimming the surface of it all, but maybe it's something for you to reflect upon as well and add your thoughts in the comments.

           And the heart of the matter in context of my posts of this week leading in to my Battle of the Bands post coming up on Monday is that we should all be open to the music that each of us presents on our sites.   In the Battles ahead as in my past Battles, I will continue to post music that I like or that interests me in some way.   Not everyone might like what I post, but I hope you'll try to as least appreciate the music.  Just because you've never heard a song or an artist before doesn't mean you can't come up with an opinion.  All the better to have an open mind I think.  Remember that the songs that are your favorites now were once songs you'd never heard before.  Listen, learn, and vote on a favorite just like you might do if you were judging a talent contest.

          Treat music as you would someone you might meet for the first time or have known for a long time.   Music should be your friend.   Or at least like someone whom you can tolerate respectfully while in their company.  You don't have to hang around with people you don't get along with nor do you have to continually listen to music you don't like.   Not under normal circumstances at least.

       I just want to see everyone have fun with the Battle of the Bands posts.  I know I enjoy them.


When the music's over
Turn out the lights

--The Doors


          Do you have a good friend whom you didn't like at first meeting?   Would you say the personification of music as an extension of those who create it is a reasonable description?    What are some of the criteria that you think determines preference?  

Wednesday, March 11, 2015

the Problem with Labels

Atlas sculpture, New York City, by sculptor Le...
Atlas sculpture, New York City, by sculptor Lee Lawrie. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)


Identification or Instilling Prejudice?

     Now and then on this blog we've tossed about the idea of assigning labels to things such as music and the effects of assigning those labels.  People will often prejudge that which as been labelled in accordance with their own predilections.   Therefore, using music as our example, if a work has a specific label such as classical, country, be-bop or what have you, a person might decide even before listening what their opinion will be and if they do listen to the musical work they are likely to hear the music based on their expectations of it.   They don't go much deeper than knowing what they like and not much can change that opinion.

Is Labeling a Marketing Plus or a Drawback?

     There might be inherent dangers from the standpoint of marketing when it comes to attaching labels to products.  Labels can have the tendency to limit an audience resulting in less sales.  On the other hand accurate labeling can draw the attention of a certain group attracted by whatever it is being promised by the label.  If consumers feel they've been deceived by the labeling, they may be lost as a customer forever.  And worse they might tell others about the deception which can give a product a very bad name.

      Typically I think a label restricts interest for those who are turned off by the label and attracts those who are looking for products with that label.   Reliable reviews and positive word of mouth can help to overturn preconceived prejudice in some few cases, but this kind of buzz can be difficult to generate.  Labeling can be a blessing for the consumer in simplifying the decision to make a purchase, but a curse for the one who is attempting to break their product free from stereotyping to establish a broader reach into the marketplace.

       So with this in mind, from the standpoint of authors and the publishing industry, is labeling books bad?   The consumers job is made easier if they know whether to look in the romance or science fiction department.  If the reader wants to escape into fiction and have nothing to do with non-fiction then this is more easily accomplished with labeling.   If a writer wants to play to a specialized audience then the labeling does a better job of reaching that desired audience.

       But what about the works that are not so easily categorized?  The hybrid works and mash-ups can be difficult to place and may be rejected by the readers who are looking for one thing or another and not a combination of two or more things.    The science fiction romance will likely be lumped in with the science fiction books which in turn will likely loose the romance fans.  Internet book buying has solved much of this with tags.  Unfortunately this is not as easy to do in a brick and mortar type environment where books are sold.

Does Authorial Intent Call for Labeling?  

       A bigger problem of labeling might come with genres such as Christian fiction.  There is certainly a large enough audience to sustain marketability of products labeled as "Christian", but one might want to ask, "What is the goal of Christian literature?"   Would that intent mostly be preaching to the choir or is there a deeper desire to help fulfill the Great Commission through literature?  Would a non-Christian or a staid anti-Christian feel duped and angry if they were to start reading a book of this nature without being warned up front?

       Same if a book were to be labeled "Atheist Literature" or "Muslim Literature" or any other such category.   Why would these categories exist other than to promote a system of belief or open the minds of others to that belief?   How readily do you find that audience who takes it upon themselves to read what they might disagree with or even heartily oppose?  See the post by Rachelle Gardner on this topic.   It's a few years old, but as relevant as ever.

        Genre labeling can cover so many different topics and styles and is even broken down into more specific subgenres.   However if authorial intent gets taken into greater consideration, should that take precedent over the actual story subject matter?    The books of Ayn Rand or C.S. Lewis have perhaps a more persuasive ideological intent than those of authors such as Tom Clancy or Stephen King, authors who certainly have something to convey about their beliefs while taking care to retain commercial appeal that will sell more books.

Get Ready to Face the Music

           My most recent interest about labeling has been more related to music due to my Battle of the Bands posts.  The comments generally left on my BOTB posts as well as on those of my participating colleagues show some very rigid preferential inclinations toward certain styles of music as well as overtly stated distaste for other musical styles.

           As I have a tendency to do, the next Battle of the Bands might be delving into unpopular realms for some, but done so in the interest of disseminating musical diversity.  While my previous Battle of the Bands post featured heavy metal (or metal influenced) artists performing modern interpretations of classical music, the upcoming Battle will be somewhat reversed.   It's coming this Sunday March 15th and if you show up for the Battle you will see what I'm talking about.

          Do you like the idea of literature, music, and other arts being labeled?   Do you feel that labels might hinder some from reading literature that is quite good, but avoided because of what the label suggests it might be?    Have you ever felt deceived because a book that you read was propagating ideas or belief systems with which you disagreed or intensely disliked? 

Friday, February 27, 2015

Do You Enjoy Music?

English: One of the sled dogs listening to mus...
 One of the sled dogs listening to music coming from a gramophone. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)


        Another Battle of the Bands is coming up this week-end--on Sunday March 1st to be precise.  A number of my readers regularly participate in this music appreciation event and seem to enjoy it or at least tolerate it.  I'm always pleased when I get enthusiastic comments indicating people have enjoyed the Battle that I've presented.  It's even fine when I'm offered intelligently reasoned comments that tell me what they didn't like about a musical piece.

        Occasionally, someone who stops by will comment that they decline to vote.  I'm glad that they let me know they stopped by, but it also indicates that my Battle posts could have an effect on their future visits to my site when they see a Battle of the Bands post.  If it's only a matter of not liking the genre of music I've used or not liking the song or artist then I feel that those readers will continue to return.  Others just might not like the Battle of the Bands and my continuing to do them could lose them as readers.  I hope that's not the case, but it's a risk I take.

       The biggest item of puzzlement for me though are the occasional comments from people who say they don't listen to music or those few who have said they don't like music.

        Say what?   Are there really people who don't like music?  At all?  Any kind?

         That's the one answer that I really would like to know more about.  Maybe it's the nature of any kind of aural stimulation and the effect that it has on those particular people.  Or something about their upbringing or sociocultural influences.   Perhaps the music hurts their ears or discombobulates their mental faculties in some way.   What exactly could it be?

          Are you one who doesn't like music?  Have you ever known someone who doesn't like music?  Do you know why some people don't like music or never listen to it?  If it's merely a matter of limiting the types of music you listen to, what are the types of music you do listen to?


        Please be sure to join me on Sunday March 1st for my next Battle of the Bands.  I'll be featuring two versions of a very classic piece of music by one of the greatest of all composers.  Then on Monday the 2nd I'll feature an interview with a member of one of the bands with some special photos.  On Wednesday March 4th I'll be joined by the other competing BOTB artist for a very special Insecure Writer's Support Group post.   This should be an interesting week so please show your support for BOTB and the featured artists by voting for your favorite version of a piece of music that you undoubtedly know.

Friday, June 6, 2014

The Results Are In...Kind of

Thomas Edison, half-length portrait, facing le...
Thomas Edison, half-length portrait, facing left and looking down into glass, experimenting in his laboratory (Photo credit: Wikipedia)



          If you've been following the last few posts on this blog then you might be aware that I've been doing some informal research.   Nothing too scientific mind you and my findings are a bit sketchy.  In fact I wouldn't say I came to any clear results regarding my three posts.

        To recap, I was attempting to get an idea about why people like what they like.  I focused on three categories:  literature, music, and movies.   If you missed any of these posts and are curious you can follow the links in the previous sentence.  Check out the comments if you visit any of these posts or missed the comments on your original visit--there is some excellent insight provided, especially on the posts about literature and music.

          The main finding of my recent research is that it's difficult to do much accurate research in a blog post.  Asking for thoughtful contemplation to questions requires more effort than most people are willing to engage in.   On the music post there was the added effort of listening to at least a part of three song clips.  The literature post invited visitors to actually read a story over twenty pages in length in order to answer my questions to the fullest extent.  Not many were willing to indulge me in any of this.

         Of course I am not surprised as I'm aware that most bloggers are hurriedly skimming through posts that they hope will be short and easy in order to cover as much ground and leave as many comments as they can in the quest for good social networking.   Looking at my stats I can see that most of those who dropped in on my posts rushed away probably because the posts were too complicated.   This has become a standard on many of my blog posts and I'm fine with that.  I'm also pleased that a few will at least provide me the courtesy of saying something even if it is not completely what I was looking for.  I value every comment--simple or complex.

         To give some perspective let's first consider the post on literature. There were 47 comments with 28 actual visitors weighing in with comments of varying degrees.  Of the other 19 comments 10 were by me while the remaining nine were additional comments from those who had previously commented.  Some of those comments were quite lengthy.  Or as fortyandfantastique humorously said: 
I feel like I have just completed an essay test! Not that there's anything wrong with that, professor Arlee. Keep "tossing it out"... I like this essay test blog format, sir :-)

         On the post about music there were 45 comments from 18 visitors.    Nearly 20 lengthy comments were left by me. I usually cluster my replies, however on this post there were so many long complex comments that I was left to respond in kind.    Stephen T. McCarthy  alone left eight very long and involved comments.   What this amounts to is discussion where my questions were answered and the commenters added their own thoughts.  I'll gladly take 15 long thoughtful comments over 100 short one liners any day.  But don't stop leaving the short comments if that's all you have time for or all you want to say.  All comments are welcomed and wanted.  I'm just saying that if you're ready to engage in discussion, this blog is a site where it is welcomed.  

           So, my conclusion regarding my research project is that though I received some fantastic feedback from a relatively small sample of population, there is certainly not enough to come to any scientifically accurate conclusion.  For that I would be better served by a somewhat lengthy multiple choice survey questionnaire from a few hundred respondents along with some additional long answer respondents.   Not having that research available, in my next few posts I will suggest what I think the data that I did receive shows and provide my own theories about why people like what they like.  This will culminate with my post of next Friday June 13th for the "Then and Now Blogfest" when I will give some of my thoughts on movies.  If you're not signed up for this movie themed blogfest then click on the link to find out more.

       
Battle of the Bands Results!  




         While there may not be any clear results from my recent research, the one thing that is clear is the voting on my most recent Battle of the Bands post (click the link to find out more about that Battle).

          This was a very difficult Battle in many ways.   As I somewhat expected the musical selections were not the favorites of many out there, but this was a necessary aspect of my "research".    Let's face it--a lot of people are not interested in classical music. I'm striving to change that, but it is a common attitude among many people.  Personally I thought the match ups I offered in this Battle were some of my best yet, but I've gotten used to the fact that what I think is "best" is often the least popular generally speaking.

         There were some harsh responses to the music, with a surprising number of Julie Andrews haters. I didn't expect that!   A good percentage of voters did not care for the classical rendition of the melody as written by Alexander Borodin.  And yet there was a near perfect balance in the votes that makes this about as close of a three way contest as anyone has offered in these BOTB posts.

          My vote would have caused a tie no matter which of my favorites I would have picked.   It was close for me since I thoroughly enjoy all three versions of this tune.  Gloria Lynne's jazz take on "And This Is My Beloved" is outstanding to be sure, but it's my least favorite of the three.   As some of the voters indicated, the Julie Andrews version was very moving and I was in awe of this version from the first time I heard it.   But in the end, the original version for string quartet as written by Alexander Borodin is the clear winner for me.  This is a hauntingly beautiful piece that I have listened to over and over again and will continue to listen to repeatedly

Final Tally:

Julie Andrews    5 votes

Gloria Lynne      6 votes

Original Borodin Quartet     6 votes

        Does the outcome of this contest surprise you?   Do you enjoy receiving lengthy comments on your blog and engaging in discussion?     Would you rather have a lot of short comments or a lesser amount of longer comments that display some interest in a topic you've written about?

Enhanced by Zemanta