| Books in the Douglasville, Georgia Borders store. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
In a recent post at Tossing It Out I asked the question "What If You Wrote a Book That Nobody Wanted?" Here is the comment left by Christine Rains:
In my reply to Christine I speculated:
This got me to thinking a bit more about this scenario. Thinking back to our school days most of us probably recall having to write book reports on books we'd read or worst of all for many of us, we were required to stand in front of the class to deliver the dreaded oral book report. I wonder what would happen if everyone who read a book was required to give their personal review on the book.
Now, to disallow any discussion about the cheaters who might not really read the book or give disingenuous reviews--since some of you like I did sometimes merely skimmed the book or read the CliffsNotes style summaries and managed to get by with a passable book report--let us postulate that everyone was honest about their reading or there was a credible way of being sure that books had been read. Let us also discard any notion that people would stop reading to avoid book reports. In our fantasy scenario everyone would be required to read X number of books per month and present an honest review/report on each one.
Using our imaginary society of readership model, would we see less 5 star reviews on Amazon? Would the majority of books that are now published never make it to the market because of a fear of receiving poor reviews? Would the best-seller lists look different than they do now? Would this society see the emergence of smarter more discriminating readers?




