This Is Me--2024 A to Z Theme

My A to Z Themes in the past have covered a range of topics and for 2025 the theme is a random assemblage of things that are on my mind--or that just pop into my mind. Whatever! Let's just say I'll be "Tossing It Out" for your entertainment or however it is you perceive these things.

Monday, November 12, 2012

Writing from the perspective of the opposite sex ­– can it work? A Cally Jackson Guest Post


       
       Getting away from politics will undoubtedly be a welcome change of scenery for many readers.  We'll still have something to think about as Cally Jackson joins Tossing It Out with a guest post about her new book The Big Smoke.  You can find her blog at Cally Jackson Writes.

Writing from the perspective of the opposite sex ­– can it work?

Do you believe that a male can write from a female character’s perspective authentically? What about the other way around?

I believe it can be done, but it takes a lot of research and ‘stepping outside yourself’ to pull it off.

When I decided to re-write my New Adult novel, The Big Smoke, so that it was told from the first-person perspective of my two main characters, I knew it would be challenging for me (a 29-year-old woman) to create a realistic and engaging teen male voice.

Seb, my main male character, is 17 at the beginning of The Big Smoke and comes from a different background to me, but I was determined to get into his head somehow and use his words to tell the story.

Before I started writing, I read a number of books told from teen boys’ perspectives to help me develop the right tone, including Dear Miffy, The Cave, The Perks of Being a Wallflower, Brown Skin Blue, and the old classic Catcher in the Rye.

But of course, I didn’t want to emulate somebody else’s voice, I wanted Seb to have his own, so I started experimenting with style until I eventually settled on something that felt and sounded right. As I progressed through the plot, I became so in tune with Seb’s voice that I could actually hear him speaking as I wrote the story. (Yes, I hear voices in my head. Doesn’t everyone? ;-) )

The most difficult scenes for me to write from Seb’s perspective were ones that involved intimacy, either in a romantic or friendly way. It was hard to know whether I was accurately describing how a guy would think and feel when he was romantically (not just sexually) attracted to a girl, or when he was trying to support a close male friend.  

Thankfully, I had a secret weapon – a teenage brother. How fortuitous it was for me that my parents had their two children ten years apart! Whenever I was unsure if I was on the right track with Seb’s narration, I’d email my brother the section in question and ask for his honest opinion. Usually I was pretty close but occasionally he had to set me straight – which I appreciated immensely.

Here’s an excerpt of The Big Smoke so you can ‘hear’ Seb’s voice for yourself:

I started thinking about the big move to Brisbane. I was going to miss the dam, and Bronson [dog], and Dad as well, even though he drove me crazy most of the time. I’d miss the place for sure, but I still couldn’t wait to get out of there. Seventeen years was long enough in a town as small as Mildah. There was nothing to see, nothing to do, no way to escape all the morons you spent every day at school with. You couldn’t go into town without running into one of them. It was pretty bloody annoying, actually.
Right then, Bronson swam past chasing this dragonfly. I swear the dragonfly was messing with him – it’d land on the water, wait for Bronson to get within snapping distance, then take off. Geez it was funny. Watching him made me wonder – would I ever bring a chick from the city back here? Half of them had probably never seen a place like this before.
I imagined the girl – she’d have perfect tits and this incredible curvy body, and we’d go skinny dipping in the dam together. She’d be nervous about getting naked, for sure. As the rest of the scene played out in my head, I was glad I was in the water and away from Dad. I needed the coverage, if you get what I mean.

When I finished writing the novel, I was really pleased with how Seb’s narrative had come together, but I knew the real test would be when the book made its way to readers, particularly male readers. Would they find Seb’s voice convincing?

I’m sure you can imagine my delight when I read the following comment in Michael Offutt’s review of The Big Smoke:

“The second narrator, Seb (short for Sebastian) is told in an authentic male voice that oftentimes left me in awe that Cally could capture so perfectly how boys feel in the first year of college.”

Hooray! Thanks, Michael! :-D

       So here’s my view on the issue of writing from the perspective of the opposite sex – it’s certainly difficult, but it can be done. I’d love to hear your thoughts on the topic – have you tried to write from the perspective of the opposite sex? If so, what challenges did you come across? Have you read any books that you think are really good examples of writing from the opposite sex’s point of view? What about really bad examples?

More about The Big Smoke

Ceara’s desperate for love; Seb’s desperate to get laid. Ceara adores reading novels; Seb hasn’t finished a book in years. Two strangers, both moving from small country towns to Brisbane – the big smoke. As they prepare to attend the same university, their paths seem set to collide, but they keep missing each other. Maybe fate is keeping them apart, or maybe it’s just chance.

When the semester starts, things get complicated. Ceara’s best friend withdraws from her, Seb’s closest mate turns into a sleazebag, and the relentless demands of university make their stress levels soar. Before their first semester is over, both Seb and Ceara will be forced to question who they are and what they want from their lives. Will they have the courage to find the answers, or will they crumble under the pressure? And when they finally meet, will it be love at first sight or a collision of headstrong personalities?

You can purchase a copy of The Big Smoke:
·         in paperback format from Cally's buy page (Australia and New Zealand) or Amazon (rest of the world).

  ·         in e-book format from Smashwords (preferred digital supplier), Amazon, iBooks, KoboDiesel and other e-stores.





Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, November 9, 2012

Why We May Never See Another Republican President

English: The Barnum & Bailey greatest show on ...
English: The Barnum & Bailey greatest show on Earth, the world's largest, grandest, best amusement institution. General view of the twelve colossal water proof canvas pavilions, ... (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
          I didn't want to do this post.  I told myself I would not, but here I am doing it anyway.  I guess I just can't keep my big mouth shut.   I'm sorry if I'm turning anyone off by posting this.  If you click away from this post I'll understand--not completely, but I do understand that some readers don't want to deal with topics like this.  Besides, I'm asking you to think and God forbid that anyone hurt themselves by thinking too much.

          Don't let me lead anyone to believe that I think I know much about any of this topic of politics.  Like many of you I'm just an observer of this whole mess with no direct personal investment in the process.  I listened to what the media and the candidates had to say and then I voted.   This post is only a matter of my interpretation of what has transpired in the 2012 U.S. elections and what I think it could mean for the future of  this country.   I hope you will read this, consider what I have said, and give us your thoughts.   I hope we can start a dialogue and come to some rational conclusions.

          The way I see it the Democratic Party of today is quite a bit different than what it was 50 years ago or so.  Not that I've paid that much attention over the years, but I think the Democrats of yesteryear might be a bit confused if they were to suddenly appear on today's scene.   There have been big changes in the Dems whereas the Republicans have held a steady mostly focused course since the mid-1800's--Grand Old Party is a fitting title indeed.

          Along about the 1970's the Democrats opened a Pandora's Box and started unleashing a whole hodgepodge of issues.  It's been a process that has continued until this day.  But let me stop and back off of this analogy.   After all I'm no big fan of Greek mythology and Greece is no model to emulate seeing as how they have all of the problems they've been having.  Instead let me return to my favorite analogy, one that is in a more capitalistic vein--the circus.

           Ah yes, the political parties and the elections are like circuses.  Just as in the real world of circuses there are many different circuses.  For now the main circuses of influence that we will concern ourselves with are the Democrats and the Republicans.   And it's starting to look like the Democrats are the greatest show on Earth to borrow the slogan from Ringling Brothers and Barnum and Bailey, the great American conglomeration of circusdom.    The Democrats are poised to become the constant winners in all future U.S. Presidential elections.

           Why do I say this?  The Democrats have a bigger tent.  

           The Republicans might be likened to something more of an old-timey mudshow traversing the countryside playing to the crowds who are looking for more traditional fare.   They pitch a tiny tent and put on their show with a few clowns, some standard political circus performers all performing variations of the same act, and one old tired elephant.  The crowd mostly knows what to expect throughout the performance because there is a predictability and an agreed upon standard of values.  The audience consists primarily of hard-working Americans who value independence and would prefer the government to stay out of their business as much as possible.

            The Democrats on the other hand pitch a gigantic tent amidst a massive midway.  A pompous parade lures their crowds to the celebratory grounds where hot dogs and cotton candy are doled out freely before the big show begins.  And that show!   What a show it is.   Three rings of dazzling displays with action at the tent top and everywhere you look.  Everyone is excited with so much going on--so much that no one can take it all in.   The audience members keep their eyes on their favorite acts and miss most of the others.  The important thing here is that everyone goes away happy because they all got want they wanted.  It makes no difference that they didn't see everything in the show.  They saw what they came to see and that's what matters to them.

           So what am I getting at?   You tell me.  It's my circus metaphor and I think it makes sense, but then again I wrote it.  If I started dissecting this and started getting down to specifics then I might offend somebody.  I might make someone mad.  I might lose another reader.  If I started getting too open and honest then I might start sounding like a Republican--or at least what an unafraid Republican should sound like.  But let's face it--honesty and forthrightness can be risky business in our society.

           What does the Republican Party need to do to win another U.S. presidential election barring any major missteps on the Democrat side?   Do they need a bigger tent?   I think that would just make them Democrats.   I'd say they need to find more ways to cram more people into that little tent.  Republicans will need more numbers to win the next presidential race, but I don't think they need a bigger tent to do that.  However if the Republicans don't find a way to outsmart the big tent circus party then we may never see another Republican president.

             Do you get what I'm saying?   Have I been too ambiguous with my metaphors?   Am I right, wrong, or ridiculous?   Do we need more influence from other political parties?   Anyone want to join the Juggler Party?

         


         
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

#IWSG: What Is Your Hidden Weakness?

    First Wednesday of the month means another edition of Alex J Cavanaugh's Insecure Writers Support Group.   You can discover more participants here.



           
        And speaking of Alex, his guest post on Michael Di Gesu's In Time was the inspiration of my current #IWSG post.  In Alex's guest post he was discussing the importance of writers (and others) to lead a more healthy life through good diet and regular exercise.  Thinking about this I was reminded of my own personal experience.

          When I was a kid I was fairly active and never thought much about fitness.  I roamed the canyons in San Diego, rode my bike for miles, and enjoyed physically active games like tag and kickball.   The elementary school phys ed programs were not rigorous and mostly designed as fun activity to give us a break from the classroom.

          Then when I hit middle school (it was called junior high back then) I was faced with the more regimented format of actual physical education classes complete with calisthenics and running laps.  I couldn't keep up.  I would sometimes get physically ill and even throw up if the exertion was too much. 

          From the start I attributed this reaction to being out of shape.  The problem continued through high school.  I just accepted the fact that I was not an athletic type and would always be out of shape.  Instead of pushing myself into the realms of agony I learned to pace myself.  

          Throughout adulthood I had the problem.  Sometimes if I worked too hard or pushed myself too much in an activity such as hiking, the burning in my chest, the dizziness, and the sick feeling in my belly would come back and I would have to sit down until it all subsided.   Now and then I would try to discipline myself with a fitness program, but it never lasted long for me.  

          Into my forties the problem got worse.  I could be just walking across the field to go to my kids' soccer games or even standing up to walk across a room and I would get very dizzy.  I even started to have spells of blacking out.  After falling and hitting my head a couple times at night when I'd awaken drenched in sweat and try to get out of bed, I decided to see a doctor.

          They checked me out and ran some tests.  Then they put me on the treadmill.   That's when I had my heart attack.   That's what I called it, but they gave it another name that I don't recall.  Whatever it was, it was serious enough to have me admitted to the hospital for a couple days to recover while they ran some more tests.

          The diagnosis was that I had a congenital atrial fibrillation--a heart arrhythmia or irregular heartbeat that had been present since birth and progressively gotten worse as I got older.  This was the revelatory moment when I realized why strenuous activity had always bothered me so much.  I had harbored this cardiac threat my entire life.  

          Fortunately a procedure called a catheter ablation was performed and I was put on a program of medications that have helped keep my condition in check.  Discovering the problem in all likelihood saved my life and the treatment has allowed me to live in comfort with relative assurance that I still could have many more years ahead of me.  

         In my writing life I wonder if there is a potentially fatal hidden flaw that could keep me from being the caliber of writer that I aspire to be.  I get a regular writing work out on my blog and in my blogging activity.  I'm sure this all helps, but is it really making me a better writer?

         If I had a "writing doctor" that I could go to in order to run the tests to determine if I had good writing health, that might be helpful.  Pushing myself on the writer's treadmill could reveal a heretofore unrealized weakness.  Is it writing characters, description, or plot?   Do I have some issues with grammar or style?

         I doubt whether it's all as cut and dried as that.  I guess I'll just need to write and put my output before the eyes of editors and readers to see how well it works for them.   

          Do you wonder about the potential flaws of your own writing?   Who helps you discover your writing weaknesses?   How much help do you think blogging provides in making you a better writer?
                 

              
    
Enhanced by Zemanta